Thinking of making the switch from Codility?

We want to make the decision as easy as possible, so we`ve put together some info that’ll help you decide which option is best for you.

A more accurate screening process

Candidates take Codility tests using an IDE contained within a browser online. Browser-based IDEs do not have any of the features that a fully-fledged IDE has, such as a debugger, real-time compilation, or intelligent code completion.

 

No developer writes code day-to-day inside a browser. As a result, the Codility environment is extremely unnatural for candidates and does not reflect a real-world situation.

 

With CodeScreen, candidates take tests offline using GitHub and their IDE & resources, which provides a familiar and natural coding environment for candidates. This allows candidates to give their best showing in the test and results in a much more accurate screening.

Take custom assessments to the next level

CodeScreen expands and improves on Codility’s custom test case functionality.

 

With Codility, you can only add tests to your assessment through their UI, which is limited to comparisons using the following types: Integer, Integer arrays, String, String arrays, Boolean and Boolean arrays.

 

Because CodeScreen test cases are implemented in code using testing libraries (such as JUnit, XUnit, etc.), it opens up an abundance of possibilities of what you can actually test for in a candidate’s solution. Object equality, proper exception handling, etc. are all now possible. This allows you to test a candidate’s solution in the same way your developers would test code in a real-world working environment.

More flexible pricing

CodeScreen’s pricing plans are more flexible than Codility’s.

All CodeScreen pricing plans are billed monthly. You can cancel any time, meaning no upfront yearly commitment. We also offer a 7-day free trial. No credit card details needed!

Check out CodeScreen!

Start your 7-day free trial now to help you find the right developers with real-world coding challenges.